In paragraph 57 he states "I focus more closely on myself and inquire into the natures of my errors. (Just as Rechel had said he is now focusing more). He goes on to say that he believes that things only are indicative of some imperfection in a person. Here he is saying that when you look closely at yourself you can see that the errors you have are only because of your own imperfection.
- There are two causes: "the faculty of knowing that is in me and faculty of choosing, this is, the free choice of the will, in other words, simultaneously on the intellect and will." so he is saying that knowing that there are errors in you that you have the choice of how they effect you. You can choose how to deal with the errors and how to fix them. Iam I right?
- He speaks of proving and not proving that God exist. He saids that if it was not for God that he would not have the choice of knowing and not knowing. He is greatful for what God has given to him and can not complain. Here I think he is saying that God has given him and all others the choice to do as they please and be who they want to be. But if there is no God then this choice would not exist to man. Again I think he is saying that if there is no God then nothing would be.
No comments:
Post a Comment